It seems that there are only two positions on Global Warming: those who believe in it as intensely as a new religion, and those who don't believe in it at all.
The first group are those who will do almost anything to promote the idea that the Earth is warming up as a result of human activity, specifically that the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere from organic material long buried in the earth, such as coal, oil, and natural gas will cause cataclysms of Biblical proportions and destroy the Earth.
The more carbon dioxide, the faster and better trees grow. |
But those ancient plants and animals that locked the carbon dioxide into their decaying remains were grown in a warmer moister climate.
On the other side are those who think Global Warming is all a ruse to gain political control by one conspiracy group or the other, or to destroy our culture, or to take over the country or manipulate the masses, or some other conspiracy idea.
Both of these views remind me of the religious wars of the middle ages. One religion would swoop down and try to force people into their camp, only to be driven away by another. Both sides committed lies, fraud and atrocities. Both were blind to the truth.
Today both sides of the Global Warming controversy have their media specialists and political advocates quoting one fact after the other. For every warming fact there seems to be an anti-warming fact. At the present the Global Warming promoters have lost some ground, and the anti-warming forces push every detail they can get.
In 1846, when the first Mormon Pioneers were on their way west, Brigham Young told Jim Bridger, a mountain trapper, they were thinking of settling in the Great Salt Lake Basin. Bridger said they couldn't grow crops there and even wagered that no corn would ever grow because it was too cold.
Brigham Young countered that the Lord would temper the elements for the sake of the Church members. Or in other words that God would warm it up.
It's a good thing.
Then we have the liberal, tree hugging, Green, anti-carbon dioxide bunch. They love trees, sitting in them so they can't be cut, and even driving spikes into trees in logging areas so a lumberjack with a chainsaw could be killed by a flying shard of steel.
They protest that the rain forests are being leveled and oppose clear cutting regardless of the regrowth nature of the trees and replanting activities of the lumber companies. I have bought over a thousand redwood seedlings, and the only places that grow them in any large quantity are the timber companies' nurseries. (You'd think that people from the Green Movement would grow tree seedlings.)
But the Green movement's anti-carbon dioxide position is the most wondrous stretch of the truth I have ever heard. They call carbon dioxide a nursery gas, which it is, but then they speak of it in terms of poisons.
Above, an Advertisement to induce nurserymen to buy carbon dioxide generators. |
This is supposed to be 7th Grade science curriculum in most of the United States, but those teachers don't seem to understand it.
Here it would seem that the Green Movement, if they like plant growth, should be in favor of more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere producing more green growing things.
It's a good thing.
So if you really love trees, and you really enjoy green vegetation, and if you really believe that the Earth will again become a paradise, then enjoy the warm weather and the blind controversy of the uninformed or under-informed, and the Earth will warm whether it's because we are using the fossil fuels and re-releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, or whether the sun is releasing more energy and warming the Earth, or whether God is doing it in some other magical way.
It's a good thing.
I'm not sure if global warming is a good thing or a bad thing, but I really appreciate your insights. I've never really heard that stance before. What do you think about the role that the government is taking to stop global warming? If you are correct, and global warming is a good thing bringing to pass the paradisical earth, then the government is evil in trying to stop it...What do you think?
ReplyDeleteChristophe,
ReplyDeleteI don't think the government is evil. I think that it is simply doing what is best for America, at least in its mind. The liberal tree-huggers give them more money than the lumberjacks, which blows my mind, because liberals usually don't have jobs. But the government needs money to function, and it seems like a better idea to take money from those willing to give it (even if that means changing some legislation for those groups) than for us to be taxed more.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete